The second criticism, "Furthermore, some of the applications "released" by are inherently portable." is misleading, and also does not provide examples. A reference to support this claim, citing at least one of these "other platforms", would be good. It makes a tangential reference to Ceedo and U3, but after looking at their web sites, they appear to offer fewer applications than. While it says that "there are only a limited number of applications available compared to some other platforms", it does not give an example of these "other platforms". In the Criticisms section, the first two criticisms are vague and unsubstantiated. One example of this is VLC Media Player (isn't the official version portable anyway?) 85.76.253.210 ( talk) 23:23, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Reply I've found that the applications start considerably slower than the official versions, even when not run from a USB-stick. Many people find the selection offered small but amazingly good quality -Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.205.185 ( talk) 22:01, 3 March 2008 (UTC) Reply
Time to edit TechOutsider ( talk) 22:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider Reply
0 kommentar(er)
